55 pages • 1 hour read
Stephanie AndersonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The opening chapter of Part 1 introduces Ryan Roth, who is vice president of Roth Farms, a conventional vegetable and sugarcane farm located in Belle Glade, Florida, which is part of the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA). Even though the farm is large (around 3,500 acres) and employs 130 people, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) considers it a family farm, where one family owns the majority of the farm’s business. Roth Farms, like other large-scale and midsize family farms, operates akin to a corporation. His family members hold positions similar to a corporation’s board.
In contrast to Anderson’s childhood, the farm was not a large part of Ryan’s youth because the farm was located some distance from his home. He began to visit the farm more as he grew older, although it was not until college that he decided he wanted to run the farm. Anderson asks Ryan whether he describes himself as a farmer, manager of a farm, or owner of a company. While Ryan notes that he loves “growing the crop now” (12), he does not directly answer Anderson’s question. Anderson believes it is more accurate to say that Ryan “loves the job of managing employees, field rotations, machinery repair, and spray schedules required to grow the crop” (13), since he is not actually the one in the field doing the physical labor.
This chapter addresses how modern conventional farming became “farmerless” (15). While pre-1900 American farms focused on “extraction rather than preservation” of the land (15), they followed the “whole-farm approach” (15). These early farms were diverse, meaning numerous plants and animals lived on the farmland. Symbiotic relationships between these species contributed to the soil’s health. Farmers sold their products in local markets, feeding both their own families and their local communities. They were also self-reliant, saving seeds for future crops, using fertilizer produced by their own animals, controlling weeds and pests through crop rotation and diversification, and relying on oxen and horses to assist with manual labor. Finally, the sun rather than oil served as the farm’s primary source of power.
Beginning in the 1900s, globalization created new kinds of farms. To stay in business, farms began to specialize in certain crops and animals. However, specialization had negative consequences, including reducing a farm’s resilience, making farmers and ranchers more vulnerable to financial troubles; destroying the symbiotic relationships that existed under the “whole-farm approach”; forcing farmers and their families to rely on off-farm businesses, including grocery stores and livestock feed suppliers; shifting reliance from animal and solar power to diesel power; and increasing usage of pesticides and insecticides to control weeds and pests. These conditions led to agriculture becoming a large-scale business operation, also known as agribusiness.
Earl Butz, US Secretary of agriculture in the 1970s, further shaped agricultural production in the US with his edict: “Get big or get out” (19). His tenure forced the expansion of farms across the country, and those that failed to get bigger “deserved to fail” (19). Anderson notes that farmers and ranchers, including her own grandfather Marlo, responded with vigor to Butz’s edict. However, the “Get big or get out” edict led to a farm crisis with midsize farmers and ranchers going bankrupt. As a result, the US agribusiness system is extremely top-heavy and only focuses on increasing output. The industrial model is “blind” (24) to the harm it is causing to farm families, natural resources, rural communities, and human health.
Roth Farms followed the edict “get big or get out.” Because of its location in the EAA, the Roth family had no choice but to expand the farm or be bought out by sugar corporations like US Sugar and Florida Crystals. The Roth family expanded the farm by adding turfgrass, which requires substantial amounts of water and frequent mowing. While sod is profitable, it also strips away the extremely fertile soil known as muck. Roth Farms eventually stopped growing sod due to the sod market’s collapse during the 2008-2009 recession. Anderson notes that “getting out of sod wasn’t a matter of simply planting something else; it meant fundamentally changing the farm’s business model” (26).
Roth Farms also constructed a commercial produce packinghouse in 2005, which represents the most significant “get big or get out” move. By owning a packinghouse, Roth Farms hoped to bring in large profits by removing the middleman between the farm and the grocery store. To build the packinghouse, the Roth family borrowed heavily. During the 2008-2009 recession, their main revenue, which was sod grass, dried up, leaving the family with $11 million in debt, largely from the construction of the packinghouse. The Roths refused to sell the packinghouse and instead sold-off land. Ryan notes, “Looking back on it, I wish we hadn’t built it. We had a really good farm that we had to sell in order to keep it afloat. A two-hundred-acre farm, probably the best farmland we had, we had to sell” (30). To Anderson, Ryan’s testament further illustrates how good people are trapped in a bad agricultural system. To try and increase profits, the Roth family built a packinghouse. Yet the packinghouse is what nearly destroyed their farm and livelihood.
Chapter 4 illustrates how industrial farming has negatively impacted the wellbeing of farming families. In Belle Glade, Florida, mega sugar corporations, known as “Big Sugar” (37), bought the region’s small- and mid-size vegetable farms. These buyouts cut the number of agricultural jobs and drove away businesses that depended on farming families. As a result, farming families with means are leaving Belle Glade, resulting in the community shrinking and becoming more destitute. Belle Glade is not a unique story, but one that is happening to rural communities across the country.
Farmworkers are also some of the nation’s lowest paid laborers, with only dishwashers earning less money. Most farmworkers have no benefits, are paid minimum wage, and live below the poverty line. Because of these factors alongside the grueling labor, most Americans do not take farm jobs. These jobs are instead held by undocumented immigrants or impoverished migrants on work visas. Many of these individuals live in appalling conditions and have to rely on soup kitchens and food pantries because they cannot afford food. They also cannot visit their families easily, even for funerals, because getting back into the US is so challenging. Fatality rates and pesticide-related illnesses are also high among farmworkers.
Anderson uses the disappearance of muck soil, an extremely fertile soil type, in the EAA to demonstrate how conventional farmers take more from the land than they return. While driving across Roth Farms, she sees “white and gray rocks scattered in the soil” (45). Ryan explains how the disappearance of muck soil, a process known as subsidence, on the farm exposes the bedrock, which is the source of the rocks. As the muck soil disappears, it loses nutrients and requires more fertilizer each year. For example, Ryan’s farm now adds liquid nitrogen fertilizer to cabbage because the soil is nitrogen deficient.
Ryan argues that EAA farmers are employing best management practices (BMPs) to make the muck last. These practices include “maintaining a higher water table by pumping less water from fields, incorporating rice and sugarcane into crop rotations (these crops tolerate flooded conditions, which helps slow subsidence), and tilling less often” (47). While these strategies have slowed the muck’s subsidence, it will still disappear completely in the next several decades under conventional farming strategies. Despite this reality, many EAA farmers continue to conventionally grow crops. These farmers are stuck in a bad production model, but Anderson ends this chapter noting that it does not have to be this way.
Part 1 of One Size Fits None lays out the perspective of the book as a whole. Readers learn that Anderson grew up on a conventional farm. Her background is important because she spends much of the book criticizing conventional farming practices. She emphasizes, however, that her intent is not to hurt or accuse individuals, like her father, who practice conventional farming. In fact, she strongly believes that most conventional ranchers and farmers are good people trapped in a bad food production system. Her desire to show the American public, and farmers and ranchers alike, that there is an alternative to industrial farming stems from her concern for our future. To Anderson, regenerative agriculture techniques and technologies represent the future of farming. Through five case studies that span farms and ranches in Florida, South Dakota, North Dakota, and New Mexico, Anderson hopes that readers, farmers, ranchers, and her family can all agree that it is not too late to change agricultural practices in the US so that the country has healthy food and soils for generations to come.
This section also lays the foundation for why conventional farming is not sustainable. For example, it takes a toll on farm families. Ryan’s cellphone constantly rings. Most of his calls relate to problems on the farm, and “as soon as he puts out one fire, another flashes to life” (4). Ryan’s calls stand in stark contrast to those that the other farmers receive in the book. For example, Kevin’s phone often rings, but his calls are primarily restaurant owners placing orders for his produce. Farm work in the US also now relies heavily on the labor of impoverished foreign workers, a practice that became institutionalized during World War II. Farm owners pay these foreign workers a fraction of what they would have to pay American workers. Many of the foreign workers are barely able to feed and house themselves because of their abyssal salaries and they also lack benefits, retirement, or vacation. One negative aspect from Part 1 is when Anderson discusses how some farm workers are held against their will and forced to work on farms, a form of modern-day slavery. These stories illustrate that American society does not value farm work, despite farmers and ranchers being the ones who feed Americans.
Conventional farmers and ranchers are also caught in “the treadmill of industrialization” (22). As industrial farming took hold, government officials and big businesses told farmers that they needed to be constantly improving their farming practice through new machines, crop specialization, and inputs (e.g., fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides). From these so-called “improvements” (22), farmers are now trapped in the industrial farming system. Most large farms cannot easily grow a new crop because they have sunk large amounts of capital into the equipment and infrastructure needed to grow a select few crops. They also have mountains of debt from having to pay for these improvements. There is also a price crisis. Conventional farmers view their success in terms of yield. Thus, the more they produce, the more successful they are. Because all conventional farmers share this belief, there is often a surplus of certain farm products. Overproduction depresses prices, which results in farmers having to produce more to stay in business. As Anderson notes, “those left on the treadmill have to run faster by getting bigger and producing even more” (23).
Through Ryan’s story, Anderson also shows how conventional farmers are divorced from the land. Because most conventional farms are large, owners like Ryan rarely spend any time in the field. Instead, they have taken on the role of a businessperson. There is no longer any room for stewardship of the land, because farmers focus on their profits. An example of this is with the muck soil. While some farmers are doing their best to conserve this unique soil type, profits still drive their thinking and actions. Switching to regenerative agriculture would prevent muck soil’s disappearance from the EAA. Yet, most farmers are unwilling to do this. In their mind, the initial switch would take away from profits.
In Ryan, Anderson sees traces of her brother, Josh. She worries that her brother will also become a manager, especially considering he has never done certain key farm jobs, like planting corn and harvesting wheat. Anderson’s father hires contractors for those two jobs. Anderson believes that the managerial role disconnects farmers from the land, preventing them from creating a farm that protects and sustains environments and local communities.