A War Like No Other

A War Like No Other: How the Athenians and Spartans Fought the Peloponnesian War is Victor Davis Hanson’s 2005 book that takes an in-depth look at the bloody conflict between the Hellenic city-states of Athens and Sparta that resulted in the downfall of Athens and the conclusion of its golden age. From assassinations to sieges and from torture to terrorism, Hanson offers readers a comprehensive and chronological account of the political context of the time, the combatants’ strategy, and fascinating insights into the way these events echo into today.

A War Like No Other is divided into two parts: the first establishes the intellectual framework of Hanson’s take on the war, and the second presents a thematic analysis of it. He begins by renaming the “Peloponnesian War” as the “Great Ancient Greek Civil War” because the conflict did not merely involve the Athenians versus the Peloponnesians. Rather, Hanson claims the struggle was between two competing views for the Hellenic people’s future.

The story of the war has been famously told by Thucydides, the greatest of ancient historians, who himself was a participant as part of the Athenian forces. He was disgraced due to failure and exiled, which provided him the opportunity to write his history as the war was occurring. He referred to the war as “the greatest upheaval in history.” The scale and prolongation of the fighting were unmatched, as was the fierce cruelty perpetrated by both sides.



At the end of the Persian wars, Athens had established itself in opposition to the older, more conservative way of Greek thinking. Moving beyond its previous existence as an individual, independent city-state—considered the Peloponnesian ideal—Athens had chosen to reach further by asserting dominion and imperial power over others following on from the Persian invaders. Once allies against the Persians, the Peloponnesians and Athenians took up arms against one another in a battle that would last 27 years, from 431–404 BCE. The author devotes chapters to various major topical themes, such as crop depredation, disease, acts of terror, the breakdown of the old civilized ways, siegecraft, and climactic sea battles.

Hanson compares Athens to the United States. At the beginning of the war, the city-state was the richest in the world and was the sole superpower within Greece, with a powerful navy. Also like the United States, Athens was a democracy and was eager to export its political system throughout the Greek world, by force if necessary. Hanson views the United States as possessing the same Athenian hubris and making enemies by attempting to export democracy to countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq.

Hanson goes on to compare the conflict with World War I as a tragedy and a needless event that exacted a large human price and may have been avoided. The technology significantly evolved throughout the war and altered the way it manifested on the ground but also how it remained in the memories of the soldiers through the terrible images of the trenches, the drawn-out battles, and the ravishing disease. The war extracted a heavy price for the Athenian military and political elite. A vast majority were killed or executed, died of wounds or of the plague that swept through the city, or were exiled due to failure.



Additionally, as the Peloponnesian War was between those who shared a common language and, to a certain extent, culture, Hanson feels a comparison to the American Civil War is appropriately fitting as well. In the Civil War, 600,000 Union and Confederate soldiers died from combat or disease, which is 1 in 50 in a population of 32 million. However, during the Sicilian expedition in 415–413 BCE, Athens lost 1 in 25 out of the entire empire. This one campaign’s cost was four times the amount it took to build the Parthenon.

Expanding on the cost of the war, Hanson states that keeping 100 triremes at sea for one month cost as much as staging 1,000 tragedies in Athens—three times the number of plays composed by Sophocles, Aeschylus, and Euripides during their entire careers combined. Dwelling on the cultural cost of the war, Hanson states that not only were significant statesmen such as Pericles involved in the war but also philosophers and writers. Socrates declared doubts about the wisdom of the war, but he dutifully fought, even in his middle age. Likewise, Euripides criticized the atrocities of the Athenians but still hoped Athens would win. Comic genius Aristophanes condemned the folly of war. However, he remained patriotic.

Hanson also compares the Peloponnesian War to the Cold War due to the importance of allies, proxies, and prolonged conflict over strategic points for both sides. The oligarchic Spartans and democratic Athenians can be directly compared, says the author, to the Soviet powers and American states.



Furthermore, the author touches on a comparison between the terrorism that took place during the Peloponnesian War and that which occurs today, stating that as the war carried on, acts of looting, mass murder, and terror became very common, affecting nearly all of the Hellenic world, including the sacred places, the major players, and what Hanson refers to as the “Greek Third World.”

Hanson not only breathes new life into an age-old story, but, through his modern-day comparisons, also provides a different take on the war narrative, causing the reader to feel it has never been more relevant. The author quotes Thomas Paine, who said, “What Athens was in miniature, America will be in magnitude.”